<-- home

it also amuses me

that not a single person arguing for a universal ‘logic’ has yet to

actually point out which logic, exactly, we are supposed to understand as

‘universal’.

because

i vote for later Mohist logic as the one true universal logic.

I mean…

I would be willing to throw my weight behind a logic that can have this as

a valid conclusion:

“A white horse is not a horse” (by Gongsong Long)